From 6cedb806ca6c194ebfa842141be870595b0fd79d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: cbdev <cb@cbcdn.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 09:00:12 +0100
Subject: Update comments

---
 core/backend.c | 5 ++++-
 core/routing.c | 6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'core')

diff --git a/core/backend.c b/core/backend.c
index 93ac8fa..6a25534 100644
--- a/core/backend.c
+++ b/core/backend.c
@@ -87,7 +87,10 @@ int backends_notify(size_t nev, channel** c, channel_value* v){
 			}
 		}
 
-		//TODO eliminate duplicates
+		/*
+		 * Do not eliminate duplicates here. There are legitimate uses for a channel occuring multiple times
+		 * in one loop iteration, e.g. stateful OSC layer selectors.
+		 */
 		DBGPF("Calling handler for instance %s with %" PRIsize_t " events", c[u]->instance->name, n - u);
 		rv |= c[u]->instance->backend->handle(c[u]->instance, n - u, c + u, v + u);
 	}
diff --git a/core/routing.c b/core/routing.c
index 284569a..caaf512 100644
--- a/core/routing.c
+++ b/core/routing.c
@@ -122,7 +122,11 @@ MM_API int mm_channel_event(channel* c, channel_value v){
 	}
 
 	//enqueue channel events
-	//FIXME this might lead to one channel being mentioned multiple times in an apply call
+	/*
+	 * This might lead to one channel being mentioned multiple times in an apply call.
+	 * That effect should not be eliminated as there are legitimate uses for one channel
+	 * being set multiple times in one core iteration (e.g. for stateful layer selection messages)
+	 */
 	memcpy(routing.events->channel + routing.events->n, routing.map[bucket][u].to, routing.map[bucket][u].destinations * sizeof(channel*));
 	for(p = 0; p < routing.map[bucket][u].destinations; p++){
 		routing.events->value[routing.events->n + p] = v;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3